You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The second page of a March 12, 1974 Raybestos-Manhattan memo from John J. Magenheimer to J. H. Marsh, answering John Hawkins' criticisms of the McGill safety garment report point by point. Having watched the sampling, Magenheimer had "no doubt that the source of the asbestos dust is from the safety garments," and he wrote that "the samples were not crossed and 1173 was used." He said "The report was submitted to R/M for internal use and not for publication," that "we should have the opportunity to review the paper before submission to a journal," and that the report "substantiates the conclusion that asbestos safety garments expose workers wearing them to excessive levels" of dust.
- Author
- John J. Magenheimer
- Sent to
- John H. Marsh
- Published by
- Raybestos-Manhattan
- Series
- The Motley 1000
- Date
- March 12, 1974
- Numbers
- Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002300 – 002300; Motley 1000 no. 658
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 13074 · asbestosclaims.law/library/13074
- Rights
- Republished under fair use for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Memo (page 2), March 12, 1974 · 1 pages · 64 KB
In Johns-Manville's index
Johns-Manville's legal department indexed the Motley 1,000 in 1984. Its index describes this document as follows:
Page 2 of J. Magenheimer's memo to J.H. Marsh, 3/12/74, entitled "McGill Study of Asbestos Safety Garments," responding to J. Hawkins' memo dated 3/6/74 (Motley Document #655). Magenheimer rebuts many of Hawkins' criticisms but does not say that the report is without fault. According to Magenheimer, Dr. Gibbs' report was submitted to R-M for internal use and not for publication. "The report for publication would be significantly different in format and tabulation of data." Magenheimer thinks that Hawkins' comments could be helpful to Dr. Gibbs in preparing his report for publication. Magenheimer also thinks that R-M should have the opportunity to review the paper before submission to a journal. In conclusion, Magenheimer states that the report substantiates the conclusion that asbestos safety garments expose workers wearing them to excessive levels of dust.
Related documents
- John Hawkins to John H. Marsh Criticizing the McGill Safety Garment Report (1974)
- John H. Marsh to P. G. Dolan and Others with the McGill Safety Garment Report (1974)
About this copy
This is document 658 of the Motley 1,000, from the set the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust's records facility certified as true copies, pages CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002300 to CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002300.
Cited on this site
Cite this document
“John J. Magenheimer to John H. Marsh Answering Hawkins on the McGill Report, Page 2.” March 12, 1974. The Motley 1000, Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002300 – 002300, Motley 1000 no. 658. Raybestos-Manhattan. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 13074. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/13074.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.