No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

John J. Magenheimer to John H. Marsh on Scowcroft's Memo About the McGill Study (1974)

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

A one-page memo of July 15, 1974, from John J. Magenheimer of Raybestos-Manhattan's Advanced Research Laboratory to John Marsh, answering M. Q. Scowcroft's memo of June 28. Magenheimer defended the McGill study: its aim was "To determine the exposure of a man to asbestos fiber during the normal use of asbestos safety garments in industry," and "this was done in a scientific manner." He agreed that most of the dust came from the hood and thought "Dr. Gibbs article can be written in such a way as to imply that surface treatment of fabrics reduces the dust levels."

Author
John J. Magenheimer
Sent to
John H. Marsh
Published by
Raybestos-Manhattan
Series
The Motley 1000
Date
July 15, 1974
Numbers
Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002264 – 002264; Motley 1000 no. 654
Library no.
ACL Doc 13075 · asbestosclaims.law/library/13075
Rights
Republished under fair use for research and historical study.

Read or download

Read online Download the PDF Memo, July 15, 1974 · 1 pages · 55 KB

What it shows

Magenheimer expected the report to be published, adding: "The only thing we can affect is the time of publication and possibly the tone." Until then, he wrote, Scowcroft's program of informing customers would help make the information public, and he suggested extending the caution "to the use of any uncoated asbestos fabric for safety garments." The memo shows the company weighing how much say it had over research it had paid for.

In Johns-Manville's index

Johns-Manville's legal department indexed the Motley 1,000 in 1984. Its index describes this document as follows:

J.J. Magenheimer memo to J.H. Marsh, 7/15/74, entitled "McGill Study of Asbestos Safety Garments," responding to Scowcroft's memo, dated 6/28/74 (Motley Document #653). Magenheimer states that R-M's contract with Dr. Gibbs for the McGill study was "to determine the exposure of a man to asbestos fiber during the normal use of asbestos safety garments in industry." The determination of the specific source (hood, coat or mitts) is an obvious extension of the study which was not pursued for a variety of reasons. The objective of the report was to determine the dust levels under normal use, and this was done in a scientific manner. Magenheimer agrees with Scowcroft's premise that most of the dust arises from the hood. Magenheimer thinks that Dr. Gibbs' article can be written in such a way as to imply that surface treatment of fabrics reduces the dust levels. Dr. Gibbs' report will in all likelihood be published. The only thing R-M can affect is the time of publication and possibly the tone. Until the article is published, Scowcroft's program of informing his customers of hazards will assist in making this information public.

About this copy

This is document 654 of the Motley 1,000, from the set the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust's records facility certified as true copies, pages CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002264 to CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002264.

Cited by Barry Castleman

In Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects (5th edition, 2005), which cites it in:

Cited on this site

Cite this document

“John J. Magenheimer to John H. Marsh on Scowcroft's Memo About the McGill Study.” July 15, 1974. The Motley 1000, Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002264 – 002264, Motley 1000 no. 654. Raybestos-Manhattan. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 13075. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/13075.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Products this document describes

This document is a source for these products in our database. Each product's page brings together what this and other documents say about it.

Raybestos-Manhattan: Tribestos

All asbestos products in our library

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.