No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Asbestosis Among Insulation Workers

Our plain-English summary of Asbestosis Among Insulation Workers, by C.W. Hertz, H. Reinwein (1959).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: C.W. Hertz, H. Reinwein
  • Published: Artzliche Wochenschrift 14(17):361-365, May (1959)
  • Type of article: Journal article
  • Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library, J-M no. 004296. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This 1959 German article described three insulation workers, aged 55, 48 and 38, referred to the Kiel university medical clinic with chronic bronchitis that had resisted treatment. They had worked with asbestos-containing material as shipyard insulators for 23, 21 and 10 years. Their work included fitting and sewing asbestos mats and cloth and, in some cases, making or stuffing asbestos mattresses. The article did not name a fiber type. Asbestos bodies were found in the sputum of all three. All three had reduced vital capacity, which the authors interpreted as restrictive impairment, and the 38-year-old also showed obstructive impairment. Typical X-ray signs of lung fibrosis were seen only in the 55-year-old, whose 1951 screening film had not been flagged. That patient had a bloody pleural effusion with no tumor cells found, and the authors feared a carcinoma. The authors concluded that asbestosis had been overlooked because no appropriate occupational history had been taken, no thorough sputum examination done, and the gap between symptoms and findings had not been explored with exact lung function testing. They also concluded that X-ray alone was not sufficient to detect early asbestosis in time.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Case series (three case reports) from a hospital clinic
  • Who was studied: Three insulation workers aged 55, 48 and 38, referred to the Medical University Clinic and Polyclinic in Kiel, Germany, with chronic bronchitis that resisted treatment (first patient fell ill in October 1958)
  • Exposure: Work as insulation workers in a shipyard with asbestos-containing material for 23, 21 and 10 years. The work included cutting, fitting and sewing asbestos mats and asbestos cloth on pipes, boilers, fittings and valves, removing old mats, and making or stuffing asbestos mattresses. No fiber type is named.
  • Main results:
    • Asbestos bodies (called 'asbestosis particles' in the translation) were found in the sputum of all three workers. The authors took this as showing exposure to inhaled asbestos dust.
    • All three workers had reduced vital capacity, which the authors interpreted as a restrictive ventilation disorder. Measured vital capacities were 2000, 2500 and 2300 ccm.
    • In the 38-year-old worker, the authors found an obstructive ventilation disorder in addition to the restrictive one.
    • Lung fibrosis visible on X-ray, with changes increasing over time, was present only in the 55-year-old worker. The 48-year-old showed only slightly increased markings at the base of the middle lobe and the front lower-lobe segment.
    • For the 55-year-old, a 1951 screening X-ray had not been flagged. Comparing earlier films, the authors reported that the X-ray signs pointing to asbestosis became more distinct over 8 years.
    • In all three workers, the impairment of lung function was greater than the X-ray findings would have suggested.
    • The 55-year-old had a bloody (sanguinolent) pleural effusion. No tumor cells were found, but the authors feared an asbestosis-related carcinoma.
    • The authors attributed the pleural changes seen on X-ray in the 38-year-old to asbestosis.
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that asbestosis had been overlooked in these three patients for three reasons. No corresponding occupational history had been taken, no extensive sputum examination had been done, and no attempt had been made to clarify the gap between symptoms and objective findings with exact lung function testing. They also concluded that X-ray examination alone is not sufficient to detect beginning asbestosis in time.
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • In the 48-year-old, whose stomach had been partly removed for a recurrent ulcer, the authors could not determine whether his loss of appetite came from the stomach condition.

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Insulator, Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM), Asbestos Bodies, Sputum, Fibrosis, Pleural Effusion, Carcinoma, Occupational History.

Browse return to medical research.

Cited by Barry Castleman

In Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects (5th edition, 2005), which cites it in:

Cited on this site

How to cite it

Cite the study

C.W. Hertz, H. Reinwein. Asbestosis Among Insulation Workers. 1959.

Cite our summary

“Asbestosis Among Insulation Workers.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/asbestosis-among-insulation-workers.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.