Search

848 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 22 of 43

1. State law · South Dakota

   South Dakota Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation

   …84 S.D. 93, 167 N.W.2d 546 (1969) — "Slight" means small in quantum. Engberg v. Ford Motor Co., 87 S.D. 196, 205 N.W.2d 104 (1973) — Adoption of strict products liability. Smith…

2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · March 1, 1983 · in the opinion

   Carter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)

   …Blickman, Inc. v. Chilton, 114 S.W.2d 646 (Tex.Civ.App. — Austin 1938), no writ; Ford Motor Co. v. Mathis, 322 F.2d 267, 272-74 (5th Cir.1963). These findings, in turn, entailed a…

3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 28, 2023 · in the opinion

   Hall v. Johnson & Johnson (2023)

   …512 (3d Cir. 1976) (finding that "a district court is obliged to take cognizance of a changed factual situation and may alter an earlier \[certification\] order accordingly"); Bayshore Ford Truck v. Ford Motor Co., Civ. No…

4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion

   Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)

   …s determination of undue prejudice is subject to review under the abuse of discretion standard. (Donlen v. Ford Motor Co. (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 138, 147.) When weighing probative value against the danger of prejudice…

5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · January 30, 1986 · in the opinion

   Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1986)

   …of a reasonable and rational nature upon which a jury can make the necessary inference that there is a causal connection between a defendant's action and a plaintiff's injury. In Ford Motor Co. v…

6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 27, 2020 · in the opinion

   In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products (2020)

   …study has been subject to peer review "does not equate with reliability," but it does suggest that good science was used by the authors. Oddi v. Ford Motor Co., 234 F.3d 136, 145 (3d Cir…

7. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 16, 2024 · in the opinion

   Sorrentino v. Ammco Tools, Inc. (2024)

   …Law Ins. 1965). Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 211, 683 P.2d 1097 (1984). Under those principles: (1) One who sells any product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user…

8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 27, 1993 · in the opinion

   Dunn v. Hovic (1993)

   …jury award in itself is a basis for a new trial. See, e.g., Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., 119 Cal.App.3d 757, 818-19, 174 Cal.Rptr. 348 (1981) ($125 million to $3.5…

9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2020 · in the opinion

   Mata v. Liberty Utilities (park Water) Corp. (2020)

   …Ford Motor Co. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 388, 402, a former Ford engineer and manager testified that Ford knew of the problem with the brakes on its Continental models because Ford had received customer and dealer…

10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion

    Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)

    …supra, 33 Cal.4th at pp. 795-796; Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 757, 798-799.) Generally, it is improper for counsel to argue facts outside the evidence, or to engage…

11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · August 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Paroni EX rel. Estate OF Paroni v. General Electric UK Holdings Ltd. (2021)

    …474-75). To satisfy this minimum-contacts inquiry, the Court "recogniz\[es\] two kinds of personal jurisdiction: general (sometimes called all-purpose) jurisdiction and specific (sometimes called case-linked) jurisdiction." Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth…

12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 1, 2019 · in the opinion

    Finch v. Covil Corporation (2019)

    …appropriate warnings to Firestone, Mr. Finch, or other Firestone workers after the sale. See Yates v. Ford Motor Co., No. 5:12-CV-752-FL, 2015 WL 2189774, at [\4] (E.D.N.C. May 11…

13. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · November 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLC (2009)

    …design choice, and not on the attributes of the product itself." Id. at 342, 528 A.2d at 594 (citing Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wash.2d 208, 683 P.2d 1097 (1984)). Accordingly, the…

14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. American Standard, Inc. (2009)

    …suitable place for the action, the court must consider a variety of factors, including whether the defendants are amenable to personal jurisdiction in the alternative forum. (Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America (1995…

15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 28, 2001 · in the opinion

    Arnold v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)

    …related to a bankruptcy case is equitably remanded, it is not subject to federal appellate review on any basis. See Hawking v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 210 F.3d 540, 550 (5th Cir.2000); Sykes v…

16. Court case · Oklahoma Supreme Court · October 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Galier v. Murco Wall Products, Inc. (2022)

    …showing." Ford [\301] Motor, 141 S. Ct. at 1026. The Court noted that indeed, \[it\] has stated that specific jurisdiction attaches in cases identical to the ones here—when a company like Ford serves a market…

17. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 21, 1999 · in the opinion

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …Supp. 1031, 1037 (D.Mass.1981); Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co., 514 F.Supp. 1004, 1016 (D.S.C.1981); Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md.App. 1, 36, 703 A.2d 1315, 1332 (1998)…

18. Occupation

    Asbestos Exposure in Boilermakers

    …Eliza Furnaces, Pittsburgh (four new boilers) 1930 Not named Rankin-Dutney Corp. J-M Circle, Sept.–Oct. 1930 Ford Motor Co., new Edgewater plant 1930 J-M Transite Boiler Wall Casing H. W. Porter Co. J…

19. State law · Maryland

    Maryland Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation

    …v. Farrar, 69 A.3d 1028 (Md. 2013) — no manufacturer duty to household members for exposure before 1972. Dixon v. Ford Motor Co., 433 Md. 137 (2013) — household member's verdict upheld. Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co…

20. State law · Michigan

    Michigan Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation

    …471 Mich. 45 (Mich. 2004) — owners' and general contractors' duty to contractors' employees: retained control and common work area. In re Certified Question (Miller v. Ford Motor Co.), 479 Mich. 498, 740 N.W.2d 206…