No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Dr. Kenneth W. Smith to A. J. Maahs on a Warning for Ring-Tite Lubricant (1954)

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

A one-page memo of January 25, 1954, from Dr. Kenneth W. Smith, Johns-Manville's medical director, to A. J. Maahs, commenting on letters about the purchase specification for Ring-Tite lubricant, used with J-M's Ring-Tite pipe coupling. "In general," Smith wrote, "when a toxic hazard associated with one of our products has been established all employees working in the fields of research, production or commercial application of the material should be warned of this hazard," with both "the nature of the hazard" and "the recommended procedures for its prevention." Noting the lubricant's 0.25% free alkali, five times the usual limit for hand cleaners, he thought "it is conceivable that our product may cause some dermatitis even though we have no record of cases at present."

Author
Kenneth W. Smith
Sent to
A. J. Maahs
Published by
Johns-Manville
Date
January 25, 1954
Library no.
ACL Doc 11275 · asbestosclaims.law/library/11275
Rights
Republished under fair use for research and historical study.

Read or download

Read online Download the PDF Memo, January 25, 1954 · 1 pages · 50 KB

What it shows

Smith pointed out that Illinois already required a caution label on products that might harm the health of people using them, and that other states were following. The lubricant label adopted two weeks later carried a skin caution (Cimiotti's February 11 memo). Three weeks earlier, on a skin complaint about Thermobestos, Smith had advised against recommending barrier cream as standard practice (the Thermobestos correspondence).

In Johns-Manville's chronology

Johns-Manville's own chronology of what the company knew describes this document as follows:

Series of J-M memoranda (1/54-2/54) regarding specifications for Ring-Tite lubricant. R. Heisler (J-M) recommends a warning that the 0.25% free alkali level in the product may irritate sensitive skin with extended exposure.

A.J. Maahs (J-M) responds (1/14/54) that a warning may create "undue resistance" to the use of the lubricant and proposes limiting the statement to the fact that the lubricant has characteristics similar to laundry soap. Heisler responds (2/4/54) that Nopco Chemical Co. agreed to reduce the percentage of alkali in Ring-Tite, although it will require "more accurate control than is normal to their operation."

Cited on this site

Cite this document

Kenneth W. Smith. “Dr. Kenneth W. Smith to A. J. Maahs on a Warning for Ring-Tite Lubricant.” January 25, 1954. Johns-Manville. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 11275. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/11275.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.