No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

James F. Morgan to W. G. Hazard on X-Ray Analysis of Kaylo Dust (1950)

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

A three-page letter of January 3, 1950, from James F. Morgan, a chemist, to W. G. Hazard of the Owens-Illinois Glass Company's Division of Industrial Hygiene, with a one-page report dated January 4, 1950, from the Mellon Institute of Industrial Research's Department of Research in Chemical Physics, marked "Confidential." They give the results of X-ray diffraction tests on dust collected while Kaylo was loaded into boxcars, made to learn whether quartz was present and how much asbestos the dust held. Quartz was not detected in the fine dust, but the tests could not settle the asbestos question, and Morgan wrote that X-ray study "appears to be incapable at the present time" of answering it. He proposed electron microscope studies instead.

Author
James F. Morgan
Sent to
W. G. Hazard
Published by
Industrial Hygiene Foundation of America
Series
The Motley 1000
Date
January 3, 1950
Numbers
Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-001895 – 001898; Motley 1000 no. 506
Library no.
ACL Doc 13052 · asbestosclaims.law/library/13052
Rights
Republished under fair use for research and historical study.

Read or download

Read online Download the PDF Letter and report, January 3, 1950 · 4 pages · 198 KB

In Johns-Manville's index

Johns-Manville's legal department indexed the Motley 1,000 in 1984. Its index describes this document as follows:

James F. Morgan (Chemist for Mellon Institute of Industrial Research) letter to W. G. Hazard, 1/3/50, discussing results of analysis done on a "vacuum cleaner" sample of the Kaylo dust given off during the loading of boxcars at OIG's Sayreville, New Jersey plant as well as on two samples of finished Kaylo. The purpose of the study was to determine whether quartz is present, and if so, to what extent, and to determine the amount of asbestos present in the dust. The report from the Chemical Physics Department of the Mellon Institute is attached. Attempts at analysis by the X-ray diffraction method proved inconclusive, unreliable and incomplete. Electron microscope studies were proposed.

About this copy

This is document 506 of the Motley 1,000, from the set the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust's records facility certified as true copies, pages CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-001895 to CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-001898.

Cited on this site

Cite this document

“James F. Morgan to W. G. Hazard on X-Ray Analysis of Kaylo Dust.” January 3, 1950. The Motley 1000, Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-001895 – 001898, Motley 1000 no. 506. Industrial Hygiene Foundation of America. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 13052. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/13052.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.