No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Klaus Robock, Can We Project an Acceptable Standard for Industrial Use of Asbestos? "Absolutely" (1978)

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The text of a 14-page talk, with six figures, by Dr. Klaus Robock, a German physicist with the Stiftung Asbest (Asbestos Foundation) in Neuss and the University of Essen, for a panel at the New York Academy of Sciences' Science Week in June 1978. Taking the "Absolutely" side of the question, Robock argued that dust levels had been cut to "2 fibres/ml" or less, and that "excessive cancer risks are only observed in groups of insulation workers and confined to cigarette smokers." He said "there is a dose-response relationship and also a threshold limit value," and that "the 2 fibre/ml value should be kept." Since household exposure ("e.g. by cleaning clothes of asbestos workers") had measured 5 to 30 fibres/ml, he suggested the limit "may be between 2 and 5 fibres/ml."

Author
Klaus Robock
Series
The Motley 1000
Date
June 1978
Numbers
Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002589 – 002602; Motley 1000 no. 710
Library no.
ACL Doc 13085 · asbestosclaims.law/library/13085
Rights
Republished under fair use for research and historical study.

Read or download

Read online Download the PDF Panel paper, June 1978 · 14 pages · 293 KB

What it shows

Robock chaired the Dust Measurement Advisory Panel of the Asbestos International Association, the industry's worldwide trade body, and the paper comes from the files of J. H. Marsh of Raybestos-Manhattan. It sets out the industry position of 1978 for a safe level of exposure, resting in part on unpublished results the author said showed "no excessive mesothelioma risk." He also suggested that a fiber in the lung "may act only as an adsorber of carcinogenic substances" such as cigarette smoke, so that "the fibre itself may not necessarily be carcinogenic." Compare the industry's own list of claims it needed to answer, in the Association's papers of late 1978.

In Johns-Manville's index

Johns-Manville's legal department indexed the Motley 1,000 in 1984. Its index describes this document as follows:

Document entitled "Panel Discussion: Can We Project an Acceptable Standard for Industrial Use of Asbestos? Absolutely," by K. Robeck (a physicist), prepared for the New York Academy of Sciences' Science Week, 6/21-30/78.

About this copy

This is document 710 of the Motley 1,000, from the set the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust's records facility certified as true copies, pages CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002589 to CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002602.

Cited on this site

Cite this document

“Klaus Robock, Can We Project an Acceptable Standard for Industrial Use of Asbestos? "Absolutely".” June 1978. The Motley 1000, Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-002589 – 002602, Motley 1000 no. 710. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 13085. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/13085.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.