You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
A one-page Owens-Illinois letter of June 12, 1956, from W. G. Hazard of the Industrial Relations Division to Ira I. Brought, sending the reprint he had asked for that morning: "Effect of Inhaled Commercial Hydrous Calcium Silicate Dust on Animal Tissues" (A.M.A. Archives of Industrial Health, 1955). Hazard wrote that the Saranac Laboratory experiments "showed conclusively there was no silicosis hazard" from Kaylo dust, while animals exposed long to high concentrations "could develop a mild asbestosis reaction." He added that annual examinations at the Berlin and Sayreville, New Jersey, plants had found no lung changes due to the work.
- Author
- W. G. Hazard
- Sent to
- Ira I. Brought
- Published by
- Owens-Illinois
- Series
- The Motley 1000
- Date
- June 12, 1956
- Numbers
- Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-001216 – 001216; Motley 1000 no. 187
- Library no.
- ACL Doc 13200 · asbestosclaims.law/library/13200
- Rights
- Republished under fair use for research and historical study.
Read or download
Read online Download the PDF Letter, June 12, 1956 · 1 pages · 59 KB
What it shows
Hazard's summary put the silicosis finding first and called the asbestosis finding mild, noting that asbestos workers and applicators were exposed to more asbestos dust in their normal work than from handling Kaylo. His memo of the same day about Brought's call is Motley document 188; the article is Motley document 103.
In Johns-Manville's index
Johns-Manville's legal department indexed the Motley 1,000 in 1984. Its index describes this document as follows:
W.G. Hazard letter to Ira I. Brought, 6/12/55, attaching an article entitled "Effect of Inhaled Commercial Hydrous Calcium Silicate Dust on Animal Tissues." The Saranac experiments show conclusively that there is no silicosis hazard to Kaylo dust. Saranac found that animals exposed for a prolonged period of time to high concentrations of Kaylo dust, develop a mild asbestosis reaction. Hazard states that in addition to the animal experiments, a comprehensive preventative medical program has been in effect at Berlin, New Jersey, the present Kaylo plant, and formerly at Sayreville, New Jersey. Ever since these plants were first set in operation no lung changes of any kind that could be attributed to an occupational exposure have been detected.
Related documents
- W. G. Hazard to W. J. Stewart on Ira Brought's Request for a Kaylo Health Brochure (1956)
- W. G. Hazard of Owens-Illinois to Ira I. Brought on Kaylo and the Saranac Experiments (1956)
About this copy
This is document 187 of the Motley 1,000, from the set the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust's records facility certified as true copies, pages CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-001216 to CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-001216.
Cited on this site
Cite this document
“W. G. Hazard to Ira I. Brought Sending the Saranac Kaylo Article.” June 12, 1956. The Motley 1000, Bates CRMC-Motley1000-Subj-001216 – 001216, Motley 1000 no. 187. Owens-Illinois. AsbestosClaims.Law Library, ACL Doc 13200. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/13200.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.